NVIDIA H200 VS NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
Choosing between **H200** and **GH200** depends on your specific AI workload requirements. While the **H200** offers more VRAM for larger models, the **GH200** remains competitive in other areas. Currently, you can rent these GPUs starting from **$1.49/h** and **$1.49/h** respectively across 8 providers.
📊 Detailed Specifications Comparison
| Specification | H200 | GH200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture & Design | |||
| Architecture | Hopper | Hopper + Grace | - |
| Process Node | 4nm | 4nm | - |
| Target Market | datacenter | datacenter | - |
| Form Factor | SXM5 | Superchip | - |
| Memory & Bandwidth | |||
| VRAM Capacity | 141GB | 96GB | +47% |
| Memory Type | HBM3e | HBM3 | - |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4.8 TB/s | 4.0 TB/s | +20% |
| Memory Bus Width | 6144-bit | 6144-bit | - |
| Compute Infrastructure | |||
| CUDA Cores | 16,896 | 16,896 | |
| Tensor Cores (AI) | 528 | 528 | |
| AI & Compute Performance (TFLOPS) | |||
| FP32 (Single Precision) | 67 TFLOPS | 67 TFLOPS | |
| FP16 (Half Precision) | 1,979 TFLOPS | 1,979 TFLOPS | |
| TF32 (Tensor Float) | 989 TFLOPS | 989 TFLOPS | |
| FP64 (Double Precision) | 34 TFLOPS | 34 TFLOPS | |
| INT8 (Integer Precision) | 3,958 TOPS | N/A | |
| Power & Efficiency | |||
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 700W | 900W | -22% |
| PCIe Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 | - |
| Multi-GPU Interconnect | NVLink 4.0 (900 GB/s) | NVLink-C2C (900 GB/s) | - |
🎯 Use Case Recommendations
LLM & Large Model Training
NVIDIA H200
Higher VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth are critical for training large language models. The H200 offers 141GB compared to 96GB.
AI Inference
NVIDIA H200
For inference workloads, performance per watt matters most. Consider the balance between FP16/INT8 throughput and power consumption.
Budget-Conscious Choice
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
Based on current cloud pricing, the GH200 starts at a lower hourly rate.
Technical Deep Dive: H200 vs GH200
This is a generational comparison within the NVIDIA ecosystem, pitting Hopper against Hopper + Grace. The H200 has a significant **45GB VRAM advantage**, which is crucial for training massive datasets or large language models. From a cost perspective, the **GH200** is currently about **0% cheaper** per hour, offering better value for budget-conscious projects.
NVIDIA H200 is Best For:
- LLM inference at scale
- Large context window models
- Budget deployments
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper is Best For:
- CPU+GPU unified computing
- Large-memory AI workloads
- Standard GPU deployments
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU is better for AI training: H200 or GH200?
For AI training, the key factors are VRAM size, memory bandwidth, and tensor core performance. The H200 offers 141GB of HBM3e memory with 4.8 TB/s bandwidth, while the GH200 provides 96GB of HBM3 with 4.0 TB/s bandwidth. For larger models, the H200's higher VRAM capacity gives it an advantage.
What is the price difference between H200 and GH200 in the cloud?
Cloud GPU rental prices vary by provider and region. Based on our data, H200 starts at $1.49/hour while GH200 starts at $1.49/hour. This represents a 0% price difference.
Can I use GH200 instead of H200 for my workload?
It depends on your specific requirements. If your model fits within 96GB of VRAM and you don't need the additional throughput of the H200, the GH200 can be a cost-effective alternative. However, for workloads requiring maximum memory capacity or multi-GPU scaling, the H200's NVLink support (NVLink 4.0 (900 GB/s)) may be essential.
Ready to rent a GPU?
Compare live pricing across 50+ cloud providers and find the best deal.